<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Perfection is the enemy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.criticalresults.com/2010/01/18/perfection-is-the-enemy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.criticalresults.com/2010/01/18/perfection-is-the-enemy/</link>
	<description>get software done faster, sharpen your team, gain balance and control... and make your project NOT SUCK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 02:37:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W. Schumann</title>
		<link>http://blog.criticalresults.com/2010/01/18/perfection-is-the-enemy/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark W. Schumann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.criticalresults.com/?p=172#comment-165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good point. Let me ask you this, though. Have you seen canned software that manages the &quot;too many features&quot; problem adeptly? I imagine, although I&#039;ve never thought about it really, that there should be a way to hide or take away features that you don&#039;t use and only add complexity.

Microsoft kind of took a stab at this with its expanding menus in Office, right? They hid the lesser-used features on menus, but you could get at them by hovering for a long time or hitting a special dropdown thingie. Does that work for you, from a usability standpoint?

Actually, Josh, are you speaking specifically of (your speciality) user experience? Or does it go farther than that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point. Let me ask you this, though. Have you seen canned software that manages the &#8220;too many features&#8221; problem adeptly? I imagine, although I&#8217;ve never thought about it really, that there should be a way to hide or take away features that you don&#8217;t use and only add complexity.</p>
<p>Microsoft kind of took a stab at this with its expanding menus in Office, right? They hid the lesser-used features on menus, but you could get at them by hovering for a long time or hitting a special dropdown thingie. Does that work for you, from a usability standpoint?</p>
<p>Actually, Josh, are you speaking specifically of (your speciality) user experience? Or does it go farther than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Walsh</title>
		<link>http://blog.criticalresults.com/2010/01/18/perfection-is-the-enemy/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh Walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.criticalresults.com/?p=172#comment-164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfection is the enemy, but it&#039;s also a myth.  The closer you appear to get to perfection, the more you realize that it&#039;s not possible to reach.

Being real is better than being perfect.

Where I start to disagree:  Most canned software available for installation will do far more than you need it to, and it becomes a burden to maintain.  So, you need to be careful to select a product that does most of what you need, but doesn&#039;t do a lot you don&#039;t need.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfection is the enemy, but it&#8217;s also a myth.  The closer you appear to get to perfection, the more you realize that it&#8217;s not possible to reach.</p>
<p>Being real is better than being perfect.</p>
<p>Where I start to disagree:  Most canned software available for installation will do far more than you need it to, and it becomes a burden to maintain.  So, you need to be careful to select a product that does most of what you need, but doesn&#8217;t do a lot you don&#8217;t need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

